Covid and Market Links – March 22

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/trumps-chinese-virus-tweet/608263/

Covid-19 has exposed our financial fragility

View at Medium.com

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/03/coronavirus-pandemic-doctors-take-serious-disease-shutdown-approach-may-be-imperfect/#slide-1

https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/inside-taiwan-during-covid-19-how-they-keep-schools-and-businesses-open-1.5505031?__vfz=medium%3Dsharebar

https://www.wsj.com/articles/shutting-markets-isnt-the-solution-to-whats-wrong-11584635925

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/21/doj-coronavirus-emergency-powers-140023

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/03/19/coronavirus-effect-economy-life-society-analysis-covid-135579

https://cosmosmagazine.com/biology/why-most-deadly-viruses-arise-in-africa-or-asia

https://brontecapital.blogspot.com/2020/03/coronavirus-getting-angry.html?spref=tw&m=1

“China has demonstrated this virus can be controlled. The town in Italy has demonstrated it can be controlled even where it is rife.
Life goes on in Singapore. Schools are open. Restaurants are open in Korea.
The right policy is not “herd immunity” or even “flattening the curve”. The right policy is to try to eliminate as many cases as possible and to strictly control and test to keep cases to a bare minimum for maybe 18 months while a vaccine is produced.
The alternative is literally millions of people dying completely unnecessarily.
What is required is a very sharp lockdown to get Ro well below one – and put the virus into exponential decay.
When the numbers are low enough – say six weeks – you let the quarantine off – but with Asian style monitoring. Everyone has their temperature measured regularly. Quarantine is rigid and enforced. You hand your phone over if you are infected and your travel routes and your contacts are bureaucratically reconstructed (as is done in Singapore). And we get through.
And in a while the scientists save us with a vaccine.
The economic costs will be much lower. Indeed life in three months will be approximately normal.
The social costs will be much lower.
Every crisis has its underlying source. And you want to throw as much resources (and then some) close to the source. Everything else is peripheral.
The last crisis was a monetary crisis and it had a monetary solution.
This is a virus crisis and it has a virology solution.
Asian Governments are not inherently superior to ours – but they have done a much better job of it than ours. The end death toll in China (probably much higher than stated) will wind up much smaller than the Western death tolls. I do not understand our idiocy.”

Exponentials: https://twitter.com/drg1985/status/1236653062225367041?s=20

“There is full health surveillance.
Everywhere he goes he must scan a QR code. The data gets sent to a central system that tracks all movement. If he has been nearby someone sick, he gets denied entry everywhere. 2/n
He also gets his temperature checked everywhere. When he leaves his apartment, there are forehead and QR scans. To enter any new block, forehead and QR scans. 3/n
When the crisis hit a peak, many areas went under extreme lockdown. Only one family member could leave home, every other day. And only to buy groceries. 5/n”

Podcasts:
https://www.financialsense.com/podcast/19537/coronavirus-week-changed-america-special-report

https://www.econtalk.org/tyler-cowen-on-the-covid-19-pandemic/

https://www.macrovoices.com/813-macrovoices-211-jim-bianco
-Also see the second interview, which had a bull

“Jim: Okay, I’ve got one about China. And I’m going to throw out a big number. And let me define it. China says that they’re 81,000 cases. I think that they’re off by orders of magnitude. And I think that they’re off by 1,000-X. Now let me explain that. I think there’s 81 million cases in China. Let me rephrase that. That’s 6% of the population, meaning 94% did not get this. That sounds entirely reasonable, that 6% of the population of China got this. Not 81,000 but 81 million. Remember, that’s a country of 1.4 billion people. They say that they had 3,400 deaths. I think that that’s off by 1,000-X. I think it’s more like
millions.

Erik, maybe you’ve seen the same thing I do. All my friends that offer their opinion about the market to me, almost 95% of them are trying to pick a low. I can’t find anybody at this point that still thinks that this market should still be sold. Everybody is still trying to pick a low right now. No one can conceive of this idea that, no, maybe it’s a new era. It’s a new post-virus era. And the post-virus era means that we are now in an era of lower prices.

The marketplace – we have to talk about that more later – but the market place right now is saying that the post-virus world is a completely different set of valuations. It’s going to be de-globalization, de-risking, higher inflation, lower multiples, restrictions on trade, restrictions on travel, and the whole nine yards along with that. So we’ve got to change the way that we are doing business. And that means all prices have to come down. Now that all prices are coming down, central banks are seeing what’s happening and they’re trying to stop it. And I don’t think they can. ”

https://www.financialsense.com/podcast/19545/coronavirus-temporary-stimulus-limitless-says-eoin-treacy

Mandatory Covid-19 Podcast and links post

“There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen” – Vladimir Lenin

https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca

A chart I made of Toronto’s lag time to other countries (updated last monday):
20200314_covid

What countries that have contained covid are doing:
China: https://twitter.com/NAChristakis/status/1237020518781460480
Hong Kong: https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/exclusive-qa-with-hong-kong-microbiologist-yuen-kwok-yung-who-helped-confirm
Taiwan: https://healthpolicy.fsi.stanford.edu/news/how-taiwan-used-big-data-transparency-central-command-protect-its-people-coronavirus
Singapore: https://twitter.com/noahmp/status/1233588176301654016?s=20

Podcasts on Covid:
https://samharris.org/podcasts/191-early-thoughts-pandemic/

On My Radar: John Ray – I’m Calling the Bond Market Top (Low in Yields); It’s Got to Be Over

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/modern-wisdom/id1347973549?i=1000467845854

https://player.fm/series/the-jolly-swagman-podcast-2540129/ep-81-in-the-foothills-of-a-pandemic-yaneer-bar-yam

https://www.financialsense.com/podcast/19527/jim-rickards-multiple-complex-systems-are-crashing-each-other

https://www.financialsense.com/podcast/19535/coronavirus-special-edition-dr-maciej-boni-and-dr-leslie-sharpe

Mark Dow
Enter MMT:

What will this mean for the debt super cycle?

https://www.inkstonenews.com/opinion/coronavirus-might-be-needle-pops-global-debt-bubble/article/3074895

https://business.financialpost.com/news/economy/zombie-firms-have-been-gorging-on-cheap-debt-but-now-a-reckoning-is-coming

Other market related info:

Lack of Imagination

The first blind spot, as we have argued in more detail in our institutional research, is that it treats uncertain events – items of unknowable incidence and severity – as if they were risks that could be estimated probabilistically. Even if we remain in purely fundamental space, there are specific facts about the coronavirus pandemic and its impact on cash flows which utterly confound probabilistic estimation. Will its future mutations prove yet more virulent? Will challenges in vaccine efficacy for those strains make an endemic coronavirus a transformational, recurring long-term issue? Will summer heat in the northern hemisphere kill it nearly to the ground? Will governments conjure epic, MMT-level stimulus response? How quickly will governments work to implement and enforce aggressive mitigation measures? How far along the exponential curve are we actually today given our systematic undertesting?
….
The second blind spot still sits within the world of pure fundamentals, and is exposed to both uncertainty and risk. It is the tendency to underestimate the length and magnitude of chains of dependent events. Estimating how 2-6 months of a global cratering of demand and interruption in supply will manifest in knock-on effects is hard. Really hard. Assuming that you’re going to capture those knock-on effects by applying a low baseline demand shock estimate on EPS is ludicrous.
….
gain, please do not see this as inherently bearish relative to current prices. Let me take the other side of this.

What if many of the companies and industries that die were negative ROI, good-capital-after-bad companies and industries that probably should have died long ago, but for the sweet succor of interventionist government? What if the forced utilization of remote work technology finally becomes truly transformational, permanently reducing the operating expenses and capital requirements of a dozen industries? What if the federal stimulus in the US and elsewhere results in rapidly expanded networking infrastructure investments across secondary and tertiary cities to support it?

The point, again, is not that we should allow ourselves to become overwhelmed by the range of potential outcomes or the fact that many of them simply cannot be predicted. It is to recognize that the effect of events on other events at times like this is to make fools of forecasts built on some expectation of cash flows over a defined period. That’s why (thankfully) actual fundamental investors taking risk in equity markets have been busy exploring, such as they can, questions like all of the above for the last few weeks. That’s why they’ll continue to do so, no matter how many two-quarter-shock-to-the-ol-DCF cartoons get trotted out to pump up stocks.